Yates, Giles F. (Giles Fonda), 1798-1859
Found in 12 Collections and/or Records:
33° certificate issued to John Christie by the Scottish Rite, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, 1845 June 17
Certificate of Appointment to the Supreme Council, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction issued to Giles Fonda Yates, 33°, 1828 July 8
Certificate of Healing and Regularizing for the Cerneau Masons of St. John's Lodge, No. 1, issued by the Supreme Council, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, 1849 August 10
Copy of letter from Giles F. Yates, 1851 November 9
Copy of typed letter dated November 9, 1851, from Giles Fonda Yates with notation: "This is a copy retained by Yates of a letter he wrote apparently to some Masonic editor (Mackey?) or possibly to the Southern Supreme Council." It concerns the incorrect views regarding Royal and Select Masters Degrees and quotes from a letter from J. J. J. Gourgas.
Copy of letter from Giles F. Yates to J. J. J. Gourgas, 1851 July 23
Typed carbon copy of letter dated July 23, 1851 from Giles Fonda Yates to J. J. J. Gourgas reporting the plan to publish a small pamphlet providing documentary evidence of "our existence as a Supreme Council from 5: Augt. 1813, up to present time."
Correspondence of Giles F. Yates, 1826-1860
Letter from Giles Yates, Cosmopolitan Sovereign Consistory, to Sovereign Grand Consistory in Chicago, Illinois, 1856
Autograph letter from Giles Fonda Yates, on behalf of the Cosmopolitan Sov. Consistory, Boston to Sov. Consistory, Chicago. It regards exchange of representatives from respective organizations.
Letter from Moses Holbrook to J. M. Allen and Giles F. Yates, 1826 August 18
Typed copy of letter dated August 18, 1826 from Moses Holbrook to J. M. Allen, M.D. and Giles F. Yates in which Holbrook announces his candidacy for one of the first four offices in the General Grand Encampment of the United States. He mentions opposition led by J. Cerneau and Company.
Letter to Giles F. Yates, 1850 October 07
Typed copy of letter dated October 7, 1850 to Giles F. Yates Esq., of Schenectady with no signature. The letter writer expresses concerns that initiates had not been carefully screened and recommends careful questioning candidates concerning their knowlege of previously earned degrees.
